PPI mis sold who regulates these producers

After the recent announcement that the financial institutions lost their courtroom lawsuit in opposition to the FSA and the Financial Ombudsman for folks who possess had ppi mis sold to them and the announcement that they will not attraction the selection many producers in the claims mgmt marketplace are getting advantage of folks by the total volume the costs they are producing if they win the missold lawsuit for the client.
This should be ceased and a cap placed as a total volume the producers can declare as a triumph fee as the support is created to assist customers not rip them off. The Ministry of justice who control the marketplace should overview these fees to assist guard the client and set costing suggestions for all producers working in doing so marketplace. A solicitor cannot go in to courtroom on behalf of a client and charge extortionate rates for carrying out so and doing so support is no unique so why are producers allowed to charge as significantly as 40% as a triumph fee if they win the ppi mis sold declare and others should get it done for 15%-20% as the work concerned is exactly the same in all cases.
Yes we should get the reason of employees fees but recall every manufacturer has employees fees or our overheads are higher?  effectively move the client should not end up paying for your luxury so not an reason so if you are charging over 20% for the support you need to possess a glimpse in the mirror and ask by yourself are you really assisting the client or am I ripping them off.
If there was uniformity as a costs levied as a client afterwards the marketplace would be all the greater for it or else we are going to fall into the same trap as the financial services marketplace and start an additional complaint culture that we are making an attempt to eradicate from the financial services industry.
Customers can assist the claims mgmt marketplace by shopping around and not just going to the initially manufacturer they determine to deal with their ppi declare, if we all did doing so and ceased using producers that charge over 20% for their support afterwards these producers may possess one of two options and that is to minimize their fees accordingly or end it trading in the missold industry for ppi claims.
So it the client did their bit and the regulator also did their bit afterwards all customers may provide the industry with more daring but if we go on as we are it will not be long prior to customers get a bitter taste in their mouth owing to their occurence that can solely be bad for the ppi mis sold industry in general.